People v. Robinson

82 A.D.3d 1269, 919 N.Y.2d 371
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 29, 2011·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court properly denied his motion to dismiss the indictment based on preindictment delay. The People established, inter alia, good cause for the delay and that the other relevant factors favor the prosecution (see People v Decker, 13 NY3d 12 [2009]; People v Taranovich, 37 NY2d 442 [1975]; People v Finkelstein, 75 AD3d 652 [2010]; People v Jones, 267 AD2d 250 [1999]; People v Lee, 234 AD2d 140 [1996]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Mastro, J.E, Dillon, Balkin and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Robinson, 82 A.D.3d 1269, 919 N.Y.2d 371 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

82 A.D.3d 1269 (People v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Aca
2025 NY Slip Op 51052(U) (New York Criminal Court, 2025)
People v. Mattison
2018 NY Slip Op 4569 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Odum
31 N.Y.3d 344 (New York Court of Appeals, 2018)
People v. Odum
102 N.E.3d 1034 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 2018)
People v. Harvin
40 Misc. 3d 921 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 2013)
People v. Tucker
87 A.D.3d 1077 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)