People v. Robinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Robinson

14 A.D.3d 422, 788 N.Y.S.2d 111, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 469

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 20, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 14 A.D.3d 422 (People v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Robinson, 14 A.D.3d 422, 788 N.Y.S.2d 111, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 469 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rena K. Uviller, J.), rendered July 2, 2002, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of murder in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 15 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s challenge to the validity of his plea is unpreserved (People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662 [1988]), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that defendant was fully apprised of the rights that [423]*423he was waiving as a result of his guilty plea (see Boykin v Alabama, 395 US 238 [1969]), and that the plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary. While defendant argues that the court should have engaged in a more lengthy discussion of the possibility of psychiatric or intoxication defenses, we conclude that the court’s advice to defendant that by pleading guilty he waived such defenses was more than sufficient. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Williams, Gonzalez, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rena K. Uviller, J.), rendered July 2, 2002, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of murder in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 15 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s challenge to the validity of his plea is unpreserved (People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662 [1988]), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that defendant was fully apprised of the rights that [423]*423he was waiving as a result of his guilty plea (see Boykin v Alabama, 395 US 238 [1969]), and that the plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary. While defendant argues that the court should have engaged in a more lengthy discussion of the possibility of psychiatric or intoxication defenses, we conclude that the court’s advice to defendant that by pleading guilty he waived such defenses was more than sufficient. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Williams, Gonzalez, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 A.D.3d 422, 788 N.Y.S.2d 111, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-robinson-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack