People v. Robinson

278 A.D.2d 901, 718 N.Y.S.2d 672
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 27, 2000·No. Appeal No. 1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contentions that he was denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial (see, People v Jordan, 62 NY2d 825, 826; People v Debo, 234 AD2d 944, 945, lv denied 89 NY2d 984) and that he was deprived of his right to due process of law as the result of preindictment delay (see, People v Cedeno, 52 NY2d 847, 848; People v Mike, 212 AD2d 999, 1000, lv denied 86 NY2d 738). We decline to exercise our power to review those contentions as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Cayuga County Court, Corning, J. — Attempted Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Green, Hurlbutt, Scudder and Kehoe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Robinson, 278 A.D.2d 901, 718 N.Y.S.2d 672 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

278 A.D.2d 901 (People v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Robinson
278 A.D.2d 901 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)