People v. Robinson

221 A.D.2d 1029, 634 N.Y.S.2d 583, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13651
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1995·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

—Motion to expand the judgment roll and for permission to file and serve a pro se supplemental brief denied. Memorandum: Issues raised on direct appeal must be a matter of record. If there is a dispute concerning the contents of the record, a motion to settle the record before the trial court (see, 22 NYCRR 1000.5 [g] [2]) must be made. A defendant who seeks to raise an issue that is outside the record must raise it within the context of a CPL 440.10 motion to vacate the judgment. Defendant’s motion to file a pro se supplemental brief is premature because defendant’s assigned counsel has not filed and served the principal brief in this appeal (see, 22 NYCRR 1000.5 [g] [1]). Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Fallon, Callahan and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Robinson, 221 A.D.2d 1029, 634 N.Y.S.2d 583, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13651 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

221 A.D.2d 1029 (People v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

COONEY, ROGER, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016
People v. Cooney
137 A.D.3d 1665 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
WOODS, MARIO, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
People v. Woods
122 A.D.3d 1400 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Smith
189 Misc. 2d 215 (New York Supreme Court, 2001)
People v. Brzezicki
249 A.D.2d 917 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)