People v. Robinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Robinson

96 A.D.2d 707, 465 N.Y.S.2d 380, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19263

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 11, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 96 A.D.2d 707 (People v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Robinson, 96 A.D.2d 707, 465 N.Y.S.2d 380, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19263 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The proof at the posttrial hearing established that the police officers who interrogated defendant after his arrest had no actual knowledge of any pending charges [708]*708against him upon which he had counsel. Further, no proof was presented that “the police deliberately overlooked the obvious or insulated the interrogating officers from actual knowledge” (People v Servidlo, 54 NY2d 951, 953; see, also, People v Fuschino, 59 NY2d 91). The interrogation here predated People v Rodgers (48 NY2d 167) by 17 months and the police had no reason to engage in such conduct. County Court, therefore, properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress his statements. The other issues raised by defendant are without merit. (Resubmission of appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Celli, J. — reckless endangerment, second degree, and other charges.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Denman, Boomer and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The proof at the posttrial hearing established that the police officers who interrogated defendant after his arrest had no actual knowledge of any pending charges [708]*708against him upon which he had counsel. Further, no proof was presented that “the police deliberately overlooked the obvious or insulated the interrogating officers from actual knowledge” (People v Servidlo, 54 NY2d 951, 953; see, also, People v Fuschino, 59 NY2d 91). The interrogation here predated People v Rodgers (48 NY2d 167) by 17 months and the police had no reason to engage in such conduct. County Court, therefore, properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress his statements. The other issues raised by defendant are without merit. (Resubmission of appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Celli, J. — reckless endangerment, second degree, and other charges.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Denman, Boomer and Schnepp, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 A.D.2d 707, 465 N.Y.S.2d 380, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-robinson-nyappdiv-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack