People v. Robinson

96 A.D.2d 707, 465 N.Y.S.2d 380, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19263
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Robinson. Read the opinion of the Court — 87 A.D.2d 877

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The proof at the posttrial hearing established that the police officers who interrogated defendant after his arrest had no actual knowledge of any pending charges [708]*708against him upon which he had counsel. Further, no proof was presented that “the police deliberately overlooked the obvious or insulated the interrogating officers from actual knowledge” (People v Servidlo, 54 NY2d 951, 953; see, also, People v Fuschino, 59 NY2d 91). The interrogation here predated People v Rodgers (48 NY2d 167) by 17 months and the police had no reason to engage in such conduct. County Court, therefore, properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress his statements. The other issues raised by defendant are without merit. (Resubmission of appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Celli, J. — reckless endangerment, second degree, and other charges.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Denman, Boomer and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Robinson, 96 A.D.2d 707, 465 N.Y.S.2d 380, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19263 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

96 A.D.2d 707 (People v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rogers
397 N.E.2d 709 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Servidio
429 N.E.2d 821 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Fuschino
450 N.E.2d 200 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)