People v. . Robinson
This text of 143 N.E. 745 (People v. . Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We may not consider the question argued before us as to whether the book for the selling of which the defendant was convicted was obscene, lewd, lascivous, filthy, indecent or disgusting. By failing to move at the close of the evidence to dismiss the proceeding the defendant conceded that there was a question of fact to be determined by the court. (People v. Bresler, 218 N. Y. 567; People v. Bellavicini, 218 N. Y. 717.) The rulings of the trial court upon the exclusion of evidence were proper.
The judgment appealed from should be affirmed.
His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ., concur.
Judgment affirmed:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
143 N.E. 745, 237 N.Y. 567, 1924 N.Y. LEXIS 860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-robinson-ny-1924.