People v. Robinson

19 Cal. 40
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1861·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Cope, J. delivered the opinion of the Court

Field, C. J. concurring.

The bill of exceptions in this case states that certain words uttered by the defendant while sleeping were given in evidence against him at the trial. It is difficult to see upon what principle this evidence was admitted, and we are of opinion that the objection to it should have been sustained. If the defendant was asleep, the inference is that he was not conscious of what he was saying, and words spoken by him in that condition constituted no evidence of guilt.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Robinson, 19 Cal. 40 (Cal. 1861).

19 Cal. 40 (People v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Kidd
591 N.E.2d 431 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1992)
State v. Zimmerman
829 P.2d 861 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1992)
State v. Posten
302 N.W.2d 638 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1981)
State v. Rocker
116 N.W. 797 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1908)
Chadwick v. United States
141 F. 225 (Sixth Circuit, 1905)
Hart v. Miller
64 N.E. 239 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1902)
Plummer v. Ricker
41 A. 1045 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1898)
State v. Morgan
13 S.E. 385 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1891)
Carlyon v. Lannan
4 Nev. 156 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1868)