People v. Roberts

2019 NY Slip Op 1859
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 14, 2019
Docket109643
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 1859 (People v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Roberts, 2019 NY Slip Op 1859 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

People v Roberts (2019 NY Slip Op 01859)
People v Roberts
2019 NY Slip Op 01859
Decided on March 14, 2019
Appellate Division, Third Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: March 14, 2019

109643

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,

v

RALPH . ROBERTS, Appellant.


Calendar Date: February 8, 2019
Before: Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Clark, Aarons and Rumsey, JJ.

Robert Gregor, Lake George, for appellant.

Craig P. Carriero, District Attorney, Malone (Jennifer M. Hollis of counsel), for respondent.



MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Franklin County (Richards, J.), rendered July 5, 2017, which revoked defendant's probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

Defendant was sentenced to a five-year term of probation upon his conviction of attempted burglary in the third degree. A declaration of delinquency was subsequently issued and he was charged with violating the conditions of his probation. In accordance with an agreed-upon disposition, defendant admitted to violating his probation and waived his right to appeal, both orally and in writing. His probation was then revoked and he was resentenced to 1 to 3 years in prison on the underlying attempted burglary conviction. He now appeals.

Appellant counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment of representing defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Based upon our review of the record and counsel's brief, we agree. Therefore, the judgment is affirmed and counsel's request for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, 980 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Beaty, 22 NY3d 490 [2014]; People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Clark, Aarons and Rumsey, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Stokes
744 N.E.2d 1153 (New York Court of Appeals, 2001)
People v. Beaty
5 N.E.3d 983 (New York Court of Appeals, 2014)
People v. Cruwys
113 A.D.2d 979 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 1859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-roberts-nyappdiv-2019.