People v. Roberts

156 A.D.2d 968, 550 N.Y.S.2d 866, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16134
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Roberts. Read the opinion of the Court — 152 A.D.2d 678

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Malizia, 62 NY2d 755, 757, cert denied 469 US 932), we conclude that defendant’s conviction of sexual abuse in the first degree (see, Penal Law § 130.65 [1]) is supported by legally sufficient evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495; see also, People v Benjamin R., 103 AD2d 663, 668; People v Kaminski, 87 AD2d 724, 725, mod on other grounds 58 NY2d 886). We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be lacking in merit. [969]*969(Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bergin, J. — sexual abuse, first degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Denman, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Roberts, 156 A.D.2d 968, 550 N.Y.S.2d 866, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16134 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

156 A.D.2d 968 (People v. Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Kaminski
447 N.E.2d 43 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Malizia
465 N.E.2d 364 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Kaminski
87 A.D.2d 724 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Benjamin R.
103 A.D.2d 663 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)