People v. Roberts

293 N.W.2d 759, 97 Mich. App. 181, 1980 Mich. App. LEXIS 2637
Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided April 23, 1980·No. Docket No. 78-5153·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Following plea negotiations, defendant entered a plea of guilty to a charge of assault with intent to commit sexual penetration, contrary to MCL 750.520g(l); MSA 28.788(7)(1). Following sentence, this appeal follows as of right.

Citing People v Fountain, 407 Mich 96; 282 NW2d 168 (1979), defendant urges reversal. He alleges that since part of the plea bargain involved the prosecutor’s promise to foresake habitual offender proceedings, his plea was the product of an illusory bargain. We reject his argument for the reasons set forth in People v Hutcherson, 96 Mich App 365; 292 NW2d 466 (1980).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Roberts, 293 N.W.2d 759, 97 Mich. App. 181, 1980 Mich. App. LEXIS 2637 (Mich. Ct. App. 1980).

293 N.W.2d 759 (People v. Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Nathaniel Johnson
317 N.W.2d 645 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1982)