People v. Robert P. T.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Robert P. T.

91 A.D.2d 1075, 458 N.Y.S.2d 896, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16420

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 31, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 91 A.D.2d 1075 (People v. Robert P. T.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Robert P. T., 91 A.D.2d 1075, 458 N.Y.S.2d 896, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16420 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Vitale, J.), imposed February 19, 1982, upon his adjudication as a youthful offender after a plea of guilty to petit larceny, the sentence being a term of intermittent imprisonment for two weekends and three years’ probation. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence to a term of probation of three years. As so modified, sentence affirmed and case remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, to fix the terms and conditions of probation and for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). Under the circumstances of this case, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to impose a term of intermittent imprisonment and accordingly the sentence is modified to a term of probation of three years. Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Weinstein and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Vitale, J.), imposed February 19, 1982, upon his adjudication as a youthful offender after a plea of guilty to petit larceny, the sentence being a term of intermittent imprisonment for two weekends and three years’ probation. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence to a term of probation of three years. As so modified, sentence affirmed and case remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, to fix the terms and conditions of probation and for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). Under the circumstances of this case, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to impose a term of intermittent imprisonment and accordingly the sentence is modified to a term of probation of three years. Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Weinstein and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 A.D.2d 1075, 458 N.Y.S.2d 896, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-robert-p-t-nyappdiv-1983.