People v. Robbins

280 A.D. 795, 112 N.Y.S.2d 884
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Robbins. Read the opinion of the Court — 278 A.D. 592

Opinion

Order of the County Court of Suffolk County, denying a motion in the nature of a writ of error coram nobis, affirmed. The petition indicates that appellant was asked the question required by section 480 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. This is confirmed by the extract from the clerk’s minutes, set forth in the answering affidavit. Under these circumstances, no issue has been raised that requires a hearing. (People v. Bowser, 196 N. Y. 296, 299-300; People v. Richetti, 302 N. Y. 290; People v. Varelli, 277 App. Div. 887, affd. 302 N. Y. 641; People v. Martine, 278 App. Div. 966, affd. 303 N. Y. 789.) Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Wenzel, MacCrate and Schmidt, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 951.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Robbins, 280 A.D. 795, 112 N.Y.S.2d 884 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

280 A.D. 795 (People v. Robbins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. . Bowser
89 N.E. 818 (New York Court of Appeals, 1909)
People v. Martine
278 A.D. 966 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1951)
People v. Richetti
97 N.E.2d 908 (New York Court of Appeals, 1951)
People v. Varelli
98 N.E.2d 112 (New York Court of Appeals, 1951)
People v. Martine
103 N.E.2d 897 (New York Court of Appeals, 1952)