People v. Robb

23 A.D.3d 1116, 803 N.Y.S.2d 485
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 10, 2005
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 23 A.D.3d 1116 (People v. Robb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Robb, 23 A.D.3d 1116, 803 N.Y.S.2d 485 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

[1117]*1117Appeal from a judgment of the Wyoming County Court (Mark H. Dadd, J.), rendered October 30, 2003. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of sodomy in the second degree (three counts).

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of three counts of sodomy in the second degree (Penal Law former § 130.45). Contrary to defendant’s contention, County Court properly admitted the victim’s testimony relating to charges of sexual abuse against defendant that had been dismissed. That testimony “ ‘was inextricably interwoven with the evidence of the charged crime, it was necessary to comprehend that evidence . . . and its probative worth exceeded its prejudicial effect’ ” (People v Pepe, 259 AD2d 949, 950 [1999], lv denied 93 NY2d 1024 [1999], quoting People v Stephens, 181 AD2d 996, 997 [1992], lv denied 80 NY2d 934 [1992]). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present— Kehoe, J.P., Martoche, Pine, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MAY, JONATHAN N., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 A.D.3d 1116, 803 N.Y.S.2d 485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-robb-nyappdiv-2005.