People v. Roach
48 Cal. 382, 1874 Cal. LEXIS 159
Opinion
The record purports to set forth “ substantially all the evidence given at the trial.” There was no evidence whatever tending to show that the offense was committed in the county of Mendocino, as charged. This "omission is fatal. (People v. Parks, 44 Cal. 105; Peoples. York, 9 Cal. 421.) Judgment reversed and cause remanded for a new trial.
Mr. Justice Rhodes did not express an opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Roach, 48 Cal. 382, 1874 Cal. LEXIS 159 (Cal. 1874).
48 Cal. 382 (People v. Roach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Simon
25 P.3d 598 (California Supreme Court, 2001)
People v. Sering
232 Cal. App. 3d 677 (California Court of Appeal, 1991)
People v. Megladdery
106 P.2d 84 (California Court of Appeal, 1940)
People v. Pollock
80 P.2d 106 (California Court of Appeal, 1938)
State v. Siepert
225 P. 135 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1923)
People v. Meseros
116 P. 679 (California Court of Appeal, 1910)