People v. Rizzo

121 A.D.3d 503, 993 N.Y.S.2d 507
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rizzo. Read the opinion of the Court — 142 A.D.3d 1187
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 14, 2014·No. 13221 1676/95·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Rena K. Uviller, J.), entered on or about February 8, 2013, which adjudicated defendant to be a level three sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C) unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly exercised its discretion in declining to grant a downward departure (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841, 856-857 [2014]; People v Cintron, 12 NY3d 60, 70 [2009], cert denied 558 US 1011 [2009]; People v Johnson, 11 NY3d 416, 421 [2008]). Neither defendant’s age nor any other factors cited by defendant warranted a downward departure, particularly in light of the seriousness of the underlying sex crime.

Concur— Tom, J.P, Sweeny, Renwick, Andrias and Clark, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rizzo, 121 A.D.3d 503, 993 N.Y.S.2d 507 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

121 A.D.3d 503 (People v. Rizzo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Knox
903 N.E.2d 1149 (New York Court of Appeals, 2009)
People v. Johnson
900 N.E.2d 930 (New York Court of Appeals, 2008)
People v. Gillotti
18 N.E.3d 701 (New York Court of Appeals, 2014)
In re Kalil
130 S. Ct. 554 (Supreme Court, 2009)