People v. Rizzo
This text of 164 A.D. 900 (People v. Rizzo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We think that upon the trial of an indictment for blackmail, in sending a threatening letter in April, it was reversible error to prove an act committed in the following December, similar to the act threatened, and with which the defendant was not connected by any proof. Judgment of conviction and order reversed and new trial granted. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Rich and Stapleton, JJ., concurred; Putnam, J., voted to affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
164 A.D. 900, 148 N.Y.S. 1135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rizzo-nyappdiv-1914.