People v. Rizzo
This text of 293 N.E.2d 827 (People v. Rizzo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed in the following memorandum: There were no disputed issues of fact before the Niagara County Court and the appellant’s motion to suppress was properly denied. We do not, however, adopt the reasoning of the County Court, since in our opinion the denial of a similar motion to suppress in the United States District Court was an intermediate determination and as such was not binding on the Niagara County Court on consideration of the motion to. suppress in that court.
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Jasen, Jones and Wachtler. Taking no part: Judges Breitel and Gabrielli.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
293 N.E.2d 827, 31 N.Y.2d 998, 341 N.Y.S.2d 452, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rizzo-ny-1973.