People v. Rivers

141 A.D.3d 551, 33 N.Y.S.3d 908
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 6, 2016·No. 2014-00287·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Orange County (De Rosa, J.), imposed December 4, 2013, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248 [2006]; People v Lazier, 122 AD3d 770, 771 [2014]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Rivera, Hall, Austin and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rivers, 141 A.D.3d 551, 33 N.Y.S.3d 908 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

141 A.D.3d 551 (People v. Rivers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Smith
2018 NY Slip Op 2345 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)