People v. Rivers

266 A.D.2d 481, 698 N.Y.S.2d 529, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11980
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 22, 1999·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rios, J.), rendered May 29, 1997, convicting him of robbery in the third degree and petit larceny (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The trial court properly determined that the defendant failed to make a prima facie showing of discrimination in the selection of jurors under Batson v Kentucky (476 US 79; see, People v Jenkins, 84 NY2d 1001, 1003; People v Childress, 81 NY2d 263, 266; People v Gray, 243 AD2d 648).

The defendant’s present contentions that he was deprived of a fair trial by the prosecutor’s questioning of him during cross-examination, the prosecutor’s summation, and certain comments made by the court are largely unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Sevencan, 258 AD2d 485; People v Campbell, 236 AD2d 618). In any event, no reversible error occurred.

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). O’Brien, J. P., Krausman, Florio and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rivers, 266 A.D.2d 481, 698 N.Y.S.2d 529, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11980 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

266 A.D.2d 481 (People v. Rivers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. George
277 A.D.2d 327 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)