People v. Rivers

228 A.D.2d 291, 644 N.Y.2d 208, 644 N.Y.S.2d 208, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7136
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 18, 1996·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

[292]*292While the court incorrectly stated that a statutory speedy trial issue (CPL 30.30) may be raised on appeal despite a guilty plea, this gratuitous misstatement was made after the plea was entered and there is no basis in the record for concluding that the misstatement had any effect on defendant’s decision to plead guilty. In any event, upon review of the record, we find no CPL 30.30 violation because, after filing the felony complaint on February 7, 1992, the People were required to be ready for trial within 182 days (see, People v Lomax, 50 NY2d 351), and we find no error in the motion court’s order finding only 172 days of delay chargeable to the People and therefore denying defendant’s motion. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin, Kupferman and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rivers, 228 A.D.2d 291, 644 N.Y.2d 208, 644 N.Y.S.2d 208, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7136 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

228 A.D.2d 291 (People v. Rivers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rice
240 A.D.2d 322 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
People v. Reyes
240 A.D.2d 160 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)