People v. Rivera

110 A.D.3d 835, 971 N.Y.S.2d 897
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 9, 2013·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kron, J.), imposed May 29, 2012, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257 [2011]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248 [2006]; People v Bookard, 68 AD3d 1128 [2009]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, P.J., Angiolillo, Balkin and Hall, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rivera, 110 A.D.3d 835, 971 N.Y.S.2d 897 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

110 A.D.3d 835 (People v. Rivera) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rodriguez
2018 NY Slip Op 8334 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)