People v. Rivera

70 A.D.3d 1517, 893 N.Y.S.2d 923
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 11, 2010·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Motion for writ of

error coram nobis granted. Memorandum: Defendant contends that he was denied effective assistance of appellate counsel because counsel failed to raise an issue on direct appeal that would have resulted in reversal, specifically, in failing to argue that Supreme Court erred in responding to notes from the jury during its deliberations. Upon our review of the trial court proceedings, we conclude that the issue may have merit. Therefore, the order of July 15, 1994 is vacated and this Court will consider the appeal de novo (see People v LeFrois, 151 AD2d 1046 [1989]). Defendant is directed to perfect his appeal on or before May 17, 2010. Present—Peradotto, J.P., Fahey, Green and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rivera, 70 A.D.3d 1517, 893 N.Y.S.2d 923 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

70 A.D.3d 1517 (People v. Rivera) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

RIVERA, HECTOR, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011
People v. Rivera
83 A.D.3d 1370 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)