People v. Rivera

247 A.D.2d 286, 668 N.Y.S.2d 459, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1540
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 19, 1998·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Beal, J.), rendered July 18, 1995, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4½ to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

[287]*287Defendant has failed to provide a sufficient record to review his claim that the trial court did not respond meaningfully to the jury’s request for a readback. The record does not reflect the specific contents of the readback, and the circumstances do not warrant an inference that crucial testimony was omitted (see, People v Kinchen, 60 NY2d 772). A review of the existing record reveals that the court responded meaningfully under the circumstances.

Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Nardelli, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rivera, 247 A.D.2d 286, 668 N.Y.S.2d 459, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1540 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

247 A.D.2d 286 (People v. Rivera) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hernandez
292 A.D.2d 273 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
People v. Deoleo
278 A.D.2d 426 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)