Home/New York Court of Appeals/People v. Rivera

People v. Rivera

619 N.E.2d 407, 82 N.Y.2d 695, 601 N.Y.S.2d 470, 1993 N.Y. LEXIS 2162
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 9, 1993
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 619 N.E.2d 407 (People v. Rivera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Rivera, 619 N.E.2d 407, 82 N.Y.2d 695, 601 N.Y.S.2d 470, 1993 N.Y. LEXIS 2162 (N.Y. 1993).

Opinion

*697 OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

We agree with the Appellate Division that the evidence against defendant was insufficient to prove criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree. While the proof established that defendant knew the car in which he was observed was stolen, there was no evidence that he was in possession of it. Penal Law § 10.00 (8) defines "possess” as having "physical possession or otherwise to exercise dominion or control over tangible property”. Here, there was no showing that defendant exercised dominion or control over the car. The proof demonstrated that defendant was sitting in the passenger seat of the parked car, leaning towards the steering column which was broken and had wires hanging from it. Another person was seated in the driver’s seat. In addition, both the lock on the driver’s side door and the ignition switch had been broken, and a screwdriver was visible on the floor of the car. No evidence was offered, however, to establish when defendant entered the vehicle or what part, if any, he played in its taking. In these circumstances, defendant’s presence in the car cannot be equated with possession (see, People v Luter, 150 AD2d 391; People v Gregory, 147 AD2d 497).

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa and Smith concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. King
2022 NY Slip Op 03606 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. Green
2021 NY Slip Op 02841 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
People v. Hunt
2020 NY Slip Op 4270 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People v. Maricle
2018 NY Slip Op 1217 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
In Re Melvin M.
6 A.3d 955 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2010)
People v. Darrisaw
70 A.D.3d 1387 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
People v. Wingate
70 A.D.3d 734 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
In re R.K.S.
905 A.2d 201 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Burns
17 A.D.3d 709 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People v. Rosado
192 Misc. 2d 184 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 2002)
People v. Sheldon
180 Misc. 2d 876 (New York Supreme Court, 1999)
People v. Mitchell
223 A.D.2d 655 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
People v. Urena
222 A.D.2d 465 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Holman
221 A.D.2d 469 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Land
30 Cal. App. 4th 220 (California Court of Appeal, 1994)
People v. Katende
198 A.D.2d 522 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
In re Gary S.
197 A.D.2d 580 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
619 N.E.2d 407, 82 N.Y.2d 695, 601 N.Y.S.2d 470, 1993 N.Y. LEXIS 2162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rivera-ny-1993.