People v. Ritchens

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Ritchens

136 A.D.3d 521, 24 N.Y.S.3d 514

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 16, 2016·No. 4821/09 -5673/09 -749/10 4649/12 231B 231A 231·Published

Opinion

— Appeals having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County (Laura A. Ward, J., at plea; Edward McLaughlin, J., at sentencing), rendered February 4, 2013, said appeals having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgments so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed.

Concur — Tom, J.P., Acosta, Moskowitz and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeals having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County (Laura A. Ward, J., at plea; Edward McLaughlin, J., at sentencing), rendered February 4, 2013, said appeals having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgments so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed.

Concur — Tom, J.P., Acosta, Moskowitz and Gische, JJ.

People v. Ritchens, 136 A.D.3d 521, 24 N.Y.S.3d 514 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

136 A.D.3d 521 (People v. Ritchens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.