People v. Riservato
This text of 51 A.D.2d 561 (People v. Riservato) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal bydefendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered March 26, 1975, convicting him of the crime of attempted robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law and as a matter of [562]*562discretion in the interest of justice, and new trial ordered. Defendant was denied a fair trial because (1) reference was made in the prosecutor’s opening and closing remarks to a pretrial identification which had been suppressed upon consent of the prosecutor; (2) the trial court permitted testimony of that pretrial identification to be received in evidence; and (3) the trial court received in evidence an admission by a codefendant who did not testify, which admission implicated the defendant (Bruton v United States, 391 US 123). Rabin, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Latham, Margett and Christ, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
51 A.D.2d 561, 378 N.Y.S.2d 456, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-riservato-nyappdiv-1976.