People v. Riservato

51 A.D.2d 561, 378 N.Y.S.2d 456, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10821
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 19, 1976·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal bydefendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered March 26, 1975, convicting him of the crime of attempted robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law and as a matter of [562] discretion in the interest of justice, and new trial ordered. Defendant was denied a fair trial because (1) reference was made in the prosecutor’s opening and closing remarks to a pretrial identification which had been suppressed upon consent of the prosecutor; (2) the trial court permitted testimony of that pretrial identification to be received in evidence; and (3) the trial court received in evidence an admission by a codefendant who did not testify, which admission implicated the defendant (Bruton v United States, 391 US 123). Rabin, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Latham, Margett and Christ, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Riservato, 51 A.D.2d 561, 378 N.Y.S.2d 456, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10821 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

51 A.D.2d 561 (People v. Riservato) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bradshaw
56 A.D.2d 657 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)