People v. Rios

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Rios

276 A.D.2d 501, 714 N.Y.S.2d 238, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9829

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 2, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 276 A.D.2d 501 (People v. Rios) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Rios, 276 A.D.2d 501, 714 N.Y.S.2d 238, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9829 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), imposed June 18, 1999, under Indictment No. 99-00006, upon his convictions of aggravated criminal contempt in the first degree, criminal contempt in the first degree, and resisting arrest, upon his plea of guilty, the sentence being indeterminate terms of lVs-J years imprisonment upon the convictions of aggravated criminal [502]*502contempt in the first degree and criminal contempt in the first degree, and time served upon his conviction of resisting arrest.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80, 83). Mangano, P. J., O’Brien, Thompson, Krausman and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), imposed June 18, 1999, under Indictment No. 99-00006, upon his convictions of aggravated criminal contempt in the first degree, criminal contempt in the first degree, and resisting arrest, upon his plea of guilty, the sentence being indeterminate terms of lVs-J years imprisonment upon the convictions of aggravated criminal [502]*502contempt in the first degree and criminal contempt in the first degree, and time served upon his conviction of resisting arrest.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80, 83). Mangano, P. J., O’Brien, Thompson, Krausman and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

276 A.D.2d 501, 714 N.Y.S.2d 238, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rios-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack