People v. Rios

211 A.D.2d 689, 622 N.Y.S.2d 466
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 17, 1995·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), rendered April 29, 1993, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea of guilty without conducting a hearing. The defendant’s unsupported conclusory allegations of innocence did not warrant the vacatur of his plea of guilty. Furthermore, the record reveals that the defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily pleaded guilty.

The defendant received the effective assistance of counsel.

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit (see, CPL 220.60 [3]; People v Ladelokun, 192 AD2d 723). Mangano, P. J., Lawrence, Copertino, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rios, 211 A.D.2d 689, 622 N.Y.S.2d 466 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

211 A.D.2d 689 (People v. Rios) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Smith
224 A.D.2d 724 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)