People v. Ring
16 N.E.2d 386, 278 N.Y. 413, 1938 N.Y. LEXIS 1317
Opinion
The judgment should be affirmed. In this case there is proof, lacking in People v. Berman (278 N. Y. 408), decided herewith, of a delivery even though insufficient to pass title.
The judgment should be affirmed.
Lehman, O’Bbien, Hubbs, Loughban and Finch, JJ., concur; Rippey, J., dissents; Crane, Ch. J., taking no part.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Ring, 16 N.E.2d 386, 278 N.Y. 413, 1938 N.Y. LEXIS 1317 (N.Y. 1938).
16 N.E.2d 386 (People v. Ring) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Masback Hardware Co.
175 Misc. 177 (New Rochelle City Court, 1940)