People v. Ring
16 N.E.2d 386, 278 N.Y. 413, 1938 N.Y. LEXIS 1317
This text of 16 N.E.2d 386 (People v. Ring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People v. Ring, 16 N.E.2d 386, 278 N.Y. 413, 1938 N.Y. LEXIS 1317 (N.Y. 1938).
Opinion
The judgment should be affirmed. In this case there is proof, lacking in People v. Berman (278 N. Y. 408), decided herewith, of a delivery even though insufficient to pass title.
The judgment should be affirmed.
Lehman, O’Bbien, Hubbs, Loughban and Finch, JJ., concur; Rippey, J., dissents; Crane, Ch. J., taking no part.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Masback Hardware Co.
175 Misc. 177 (New Rochelle City Court, 1940)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
16 N.E.2d 386, 278 N.Y. 413, 1938 N.Y. LEXIS 1317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ring-ny-1938.