People v. Rinaldo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Rinaldo

11 A.D.2d 671, 205 N.Y.S.2d 839, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9036

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 23, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 11 A.D.2d 671 (People v. Rinaldo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Rinaldo, 11 A.D.2d 671, 205 N.Y.S.2d 839, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9036 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to dispense with printing granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard on the original record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points, upon condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points upon the District Attorney of Bronx County and files 6 copies of the typewritten appellant’s points or 19 copies of the mimeographed appellant’s points, together with the original record with this court on or before October 4, 1960, with notice of argument for the November 1960 Term of this court. Miss Frances Kahn, 401 Broadway, New York, New York, on request of defendant and on her consent, is [672]*672assigned as attorney for appellant for the purposes of the appeal. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente and Bergan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to dispense with printing granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard on the original record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points, upon condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points upon the District Attorney of Bronx County and files 6 copies of the typewritten appellant’s points or 19 copies of the mimeographed appellant’s points, together with the original record with this court on or before October 4, 1960, with notice of argument for the November 1960 Term of this court. Miss Frances Kahn, 401 Broadway, New York, New York, on request of defendant and on her consent, is [672]*672assigned as attorney for appellant for the purposes of the appeal. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente and Bergan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 A.D.2d 671, 205 N.Y.S.2d 839, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9036, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rinaldo-nyappdiv-1960.