People v. Riley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Riley

92 A.D.2d 576, 459 N.Y.S.2d 332, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16820

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 14, 1983

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 92 A.D.2d 576 (People v. Riley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Riley, 92 A.D.2d 576, 459 N.Y.S.2d 332, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16820 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pizzuto, J.), rendered July 10, 1981, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (three counts) and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. While we find the court’s statement that “[tjhere is no procedure whereby a juror can, during the course of a trial, if he has a question about something, raise the question” to be erroneous (see People v Knapper, 230 App Div 487), the error was not preserved for review and reversal is not warranted. We have examined defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Lazer, J. P., O’Connor, Brown and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pizzuto, J.), rendered July 10, 1981, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (three counts) and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. While we find the court’s statement that “[tjhere is no procedure whereby a juror can, during the course of a trial, if he has a question about something, raise the question” to be erroneous (see People v Knapper, 230 App Div 487), the error was not preserved for review and reversal is not warranted. We have examined defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Lazer, J. P., O’Connor, Brown and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 A.D.2d 576, 459 N.Y.S.2d 332, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-riley-nyappdiv-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack