People v. Rijo
This text of 220 A.D.2d 217 (People v. Rijo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Jane Goodman, J.), entered on or about December 9, 1993, which, upon reargument, granted defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence, unanimously affirmed.
Suppression was properly granted as the evidence seized was the fruit of an unjustified stop. The testimony of the People’s only witness at the suppression hearing clearly established that the traffic violation for which the cab in which defendant was a passenger was stopped was merely a pretext to investigate defendant on an unrelated matter. In particular, we note the failure of the police officers to check on the cab’s license plate or to issue its driver a summons (see, People v Laws, 213 AD2d 226, Iv denied 85 NY2d 975). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Williams, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
220 A.D.2d 217, 632 N.Y.S.2d 4, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rijo-nyappdiv-1995.