People v. Rijo

220 A.D.2d 217, 632 N.Y.S.2d 4, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9702
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 3, 1995·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Jane Goodman, J.), entered on or about December 9, 1993, which, upon reargument, granted defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence, unanimously affirmed.

Suppression was properly granted as the evidence seized was the fruit of an unjustified stop. The testimony of the People’s only witness at the suppression hearing clearly established that the traffic violation for which the cab in which defendant was a passenger was stopped was merely a pretext to investigate defendant on an unrelated matter. In particular, we note the failure of the police officers to check on the cab’s license plate or to issue its driver a summons (see, People v Laws, 213 AD2d 226, Iv denied 85 NY2d 975). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Williams, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rijo, 220 A.D.2d 217, 632 N.Y.S.2d 4, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9702 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

220 A.D.2d 217 (People v. Rijo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Dickson
180 Misc. 2d 113 (New York Supreme Court, 1998)
People v. Sanchez
178 Misc. 2d 695 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 1998)
People v. Washington
238 A.D.2d 43 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
People v. Martinez
246 A.D.2d 456 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)