People v. Rigney

63 Cal. 296, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 434
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 29, 1883
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 63 Cal. 296 (People v. Rigney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Rigney, 63 Cal. 296, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 434 (Cal. 1883).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We are of opinion that under the charter of the city of Sacramento and the se\reral subsequent acts of the legislature for the levy of the respectie taxes therein named, [299]*299the trustees of the city had authority to make the tax levy in controversy. The several acts subsequent to the original charter gave authority for the levy and collection of taxes in addition to those specified in such original charter, and' constituted an •enlargement of the taxing power conferred by the charter.

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded with instructions to overrule the demurrer.

McKee, J., dissented.

Rehearing denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Grass Valley v. Walkinshaw
212 P.2d 894 (California Supreme Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 Cal. 296, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rigney-cal-1883.