People v. Riggio

206 A.D. 673

This text of 206 A.D. 673 (People v. Riggio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Riggio, 206 A.D. 673 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

Judgment of conviction of the County Court of Kings county reversed, and a new trial ordered. Reversible error was committed by the learned trial court in its charge in reference to the character evidence (folios 286, 289). (People v. Blatt, 136 App. Div. 717; People v. Trimarchi, 231 N. Y. 263.) We are also of opinion that the court’s charge regarding the police upon the subject of defendant’s confession, appearing at folios 273 to 278, inclusive, was of such a nature as to deprive the defendant of a fair and impartial trial. Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Kelby and Young, JJ., concur; Kapper, J., dissents upon the ground that the charge does not involve legal error; that the questions of fact were fairly submitted to the jury, and that the evidence established the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. . Trimarchi
131 N.E. 910 (New York Court of Appeals, 1921)
People v. Blatt
136 A.D. 717 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
206 A.D. 673, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-riggio-nyappdiv-1923.