People v. Rieman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Rieman

282 A.D.2d 776, 722 N.Y.S.2d 438, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3645

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 5, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 282 A.D.2d 776 (People v. Rieman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Rieman, 282 A.D.2d 776, 722 N.Y.S.2d 438, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3645 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Mathews, J.), rendered December 21, 1999, convicting defendant upon her plea of guilty of the crime of forgery in the second degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of forgery in the second degree and was sentenced to six months in jail and a three-year conditional discharge. Defense counsel asserts that no nonfrivolous appealable issues exist and seeks to be relieved of her assignment. Our review of the record and defense counsel’s brief leads us to the same conclusion. Defendant entered a knowing, voluntary and intelligent plea of guilty and received an appropriate sentence. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, lv denied 67 NY2d 650).

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Spain, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Mathews, J.), rendered December 21, 1999, convicting defendant upon her plea of guilty of the crime of forgery in the second degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of forgery in the second degree and was sentenced to six months in jail and a three-year conditional discharge. Defense counsel asserts that no nonfrivolous appealable issues exist and seeks to be relieved of her assignment. Our review of the record and defense counsel’s brief leads us to the same conclusion. Defendant entered a knowing, voluntary and intelligent plea of guilty and received an appropriate sentence. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, lv denied 67 NY2d 650).

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Spain, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 A.D.2d 776, 722 N.Y.S.2d 438, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rieman-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack