People v. Riela

169 N.E.2d 439, 8 N.Y.2d 1008
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 8, 1960·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will he amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there were presented and necessarily passed upon questions under the Constitution of the United States as follows: Defendant contended that the application in his ease of section 2447 of the Penal Law and section 618-a of the Code of Criminal Procedure violated [1009]*1009his rights under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Federal Constitution. The Court of Appeals held that defendant’s rights under the Fourteenth Amendment were not violated. (See 7 N Y 2d 571.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Riela, 169 N.E.2d 439, 8 N.Y.2d 1008 (N.Y. 1960).

169 N.E.2d 439 (People v. Riela) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related