People v. Riedel

Appellate Court of Illinois

People v. Riedel

106 N.E.2d 215, 347 Ill. App. 173, 1952 Ill. App. LEXIS 346

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedMay 21, 1952

DocketGen. No. 45,527

StatusPublished

This text of 106 N.E.2d 215 (People v. Riedel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Riedel, 106 N.E.2d 215, 347 Ill. App. 173, 1952 Ill. App. LEXIS 346 (Ill. Ct. App. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Kilby

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a writ of error to review a proceeding against a physiotherapist for violating the Medical Practice Act. Ill. Rev. Stat. 1951, chap. 91, pars. l-16x [Jones Ill. Stats. Ann. 79.01-79.40]. A jury found defendant guilty of violating section 24 of the Act (par. 16i) [Jones Ill. Stats. Ann. 79.25] by diagnosing and treating ‘ ‘ supposed ailments ’ ’ and using the title " Doctor. ’ ’ The jury fixed a total punishment at $1,500 fine and 15 days in the county jail.

The record before us contains no judgment rendered by the court. There is no appeal from a verdict. Since there is no appealable judgment shown by the record, there is no jurisdiction in this court to review the proceedings.

The writ of error is therefore dismissed.

Writ of error dismissed.

Lews and Feinberg, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI