People v. Ridley

254 A.D.2d 210, 679 N.Y.S.2d 571, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11340

This text of 254 A.D.2d 210 (People v. Ridley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Ridley, 254 A.D.2d 210, 679 N.Y.S.2d 571, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11340 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Beal, J.), rendered November 26, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4V2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly refused to charge the jury on the defense of agency. We find that no reasonable view of the evidence, including defendant’s own testimony, that could support an inference that defendant was acting as an extension of the buyer (see, People v Herring, 83 NY2d 780). Concur — Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Herring
632 N.E.2d 1272 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 A.D.2d 210, 679 N.Y.S.2d 571, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ridley-nyappdiv-1998.