People v. Ricks

773 N.W.2d 662, 485 Mich. 925
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided October 23, 2009·No. 139407·Published

Opinion

773 N.W.2d 662 (2009)

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Edward RICKS, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 139407. COA No. 283053.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

October 23, 2009.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 9, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

MARKMAN, J. (dissenting).

Because I believe it to be a jurisprudentially significant issue, I would grant leave to appeal to consider whether pursuant to *663 Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1364, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004), the admission of a law enforcement officer's testimony concerning the substance of an anonymous phone call violated defendant's Sixth Amendment right to confront the witnesses against him.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ricks, 773 N.W.2d 662, 485 Mich. 925 (Mich. 2009).

773 N.W.2d 662 (People v. Ricks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crawford v. Washington
541 U.S. 36 (Supreme Court, 2004)