People v. Rickett

276 A.D.2d 568, 714 N.Y.S.2d 690, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10159
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rickett. Read the opinion of the Court — 259 A.D.2d 636

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County [569]*569(Berry, J.), rendered May 31, 1997, convicting her of burglary in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the elements of burglary in the second degree beyond a reasonable doubt (see, Penal Law § 140.25; see also, People v Konikov, 160 AD2d 146, 149).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Santucci, J. P., Thompson, Sullivan and Gold-stein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rickett, 276 A.D.2d 568, 714 N.Y.S.2d 690, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10159 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

276 A.D.2d 568 (People v. Rickett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Konikov
160 A.D.2d 146 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)