People v. Richmond Poster Advertising Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Richmond Poster Advertising Co.

5 A.D.2d 877, 171 N.Y.S.2d 286, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6692

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 10, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 5 A.D.2d 877 (People v. Richmond Poster Advertising Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Richmond Poster Advertising Co., 5 A.D.2d 877, 171 N.Y.S.2d 286, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6692 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by a judgment creditor on behalf of himself and other creditors, National Constructors, Inc., the judgment debtor, and Francis A. Rogers, alleged to be its sole stockholder, director and officer, appeal from an order (1) granting respondent’s motion for a temporary injunction restraining the appel[878]*878lant Rogers from transferring or disposing of five mortgages, and appointing a receiver tlierefor, and (2) denying appellants’ cross motion to dismiss the amended complaint for insufficiency, and for alternative relief. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion.

Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by a judgment creditor on behalf of himself and other creditors, National Constructors, Inc., the judgment debtor, and Francis A. Rogers, alleged to be its sole stockholder, director and officer, appeal from an order (1) granting respondent’s motion for a temporary injunction restraining the appel[878]*878lant Rogers from transferring or disposing of five mortgages, and appointing a receiver tlierefor, and (2) denying appellants’ cross motion to dismiss the amended complaint for insufficiency, and for alternative relief. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion.

Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 A.D.2d 877, 171 N.Y.S.2d 286, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-richmond-poster-advertising-co-nyappdiv-1958.