People v. Richburg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Richburg

135 A.D.2d 667, 522 N.Y.S.2d 470, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52603

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 14, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 135 A.D.2d 667 (People v. Richburg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Richburg, 135 A.D.2d 667, 522 N.Y.S.2d 470, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52603 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schneier, J.), rendered March 24, 1983, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The evidence at the trial was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power we are satisfied that the evidence established the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). The assessment of the credibility of the witnesses at trial was primarily for the jury (see, People v Jeffries, 125 AD2d 412, lv denied 69 NY2d 882) and nothing in the record warrants disturbing its resolution of those issues. Brown, J. P., Weinstein, Kooper and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schneier, J.), rendered March 24, 1983, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The evidence at the trial was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power we are satisfied that the evidence established the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). The assessment of the credibility of the witnesses at trial was primarily for the jury (see, People v Jeffries, 125 AD2d 412, lv denied 69 NY2d 882) and nothing in the record warrants disturbing its resolution of those issues. Brown, J. P., Weinstein, Kooper and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

135 A.D.2d 667, 522 N.Y.S.2d 470, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-richburg-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack