People v. Richardson

2026 NY Slip Op 00682
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 11, 2026
Docket71 KA 22-01652
StatusPublished

This text of 2026 NY Slip Op 00682 (People v. Richardson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Richardson, 2026 NY Slip Op 00682 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

People v Richardson (2026 NY Slip Op 00682)
People v Richardson
2026 NY Slip Op 00682
Decided on February 11, 2026
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 11, 2026 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CURRAN, J.P., BANNISTER, SMITH, OGDEN, AND DELCONTE, JJ.

71 KA 22-01652

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

JOSHUA RICHARDSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (RYAN M. BERGMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (BRADLEY W. OASTLER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (Matthew J. Doran, J.), rendered September 20, 2022. The judgment convicted defendant upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of weapon in the second degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law § 265.03 [3]), defendant contends that Penal Law § 265.03 is unconstitutional in light of New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v Bruen (597 US 1 [2022]). We have rejected identical contentions in prior cases, holding that Bruen "had no impact on the constitutionality of New York State's criminal possession of a weapon statutes" (People v Mancuso, 225 AD3d 1151, 1153 [4th Dept 2024], lv denied 43 NY3d 964 [2025] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see People v Brinson, 240 AD3d 1376, 1378 [4th Dept 2025]), and we perceive no reason to reach a different conclusion here. Indeed, we note that the Court of Appeals recently held "that Bruen did not render the state's entire gun licensing scheme unconstitutional" inasmuch as the specific portion of the scheme that it invalidated is "severable" (People v Johnson, — NY3d —, —, 2025 NY Slip Op 06528, *3 [2025]).

Entered: February 11, 2026

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Johnson
2025 NY Slip Op 06528 (New York Court of Appeals, 2025)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2026 NY Slip Op 00682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-richardson-nyappdiv-2026.