People v. Richardson

2017 NY Slip Op 3140, 149 A.D.3d 650, 50 N.Y.S.3d 872
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Richardson. Read the opinion of the Court — 118 A.D.3d 821
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 25, 2017·No. 3842 342/05 3943/04·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Patricia M. Núñez, J.), entered December 20, 2012, which adjudicated defendant a level three sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Of *651 fender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Based on reliable information (see People v Mingo, 12 NY3d 563 [2009]), the court correctly assessed 20 points under the risk factor for continuing course of sexual misconduct, and also correctly determined that a presumptive override applied because of the facts underlying defendant’s out-of-state conviction. In any event, regardless of whether defendant’s correct point score is 180, as the court found, or 160, as he contends, and regardless of any override, defendant remains a level three offender, and there is no basis for a downward departure (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 [2014]). The mitigating factors cited by defendant, including relatively recent compliance with supervision and treatment, were outweighed by the seriousness of defendant’s overall history, which demonstrates that he presents a grave danger to young children.

Concur — Tom, J.R, Mazzarelli, Andrias, Manzanet-Daniels and Webber, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Richardson, 2017 NY Slip Op 3140, 149 A.D.3d 650, 50 N.Y.S.3d 872 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 3140 (People v. Richardson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Mingo
910 N.E.2d 983 (New York Court of Appeals, 2009)
People v. Gillotti
18 N.E.3d 701 (New York Court of Appeals, 2014)