People v. Richardson

134 A.D.3d 440, 19 N.Y.S.3d 738
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Richardson. Read the opinion of the Court — 101 A.D.3d 837
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 3, 2015·No. 16282 4632/11·Published

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ruth Pickholz, J.), rendered February 23, 2012, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion. Although defendant was in custody and had not yet received Miranda warnings, his inquiry about why he was being charged with a felony was “immediately met by a brief and relatively innocuous answer by the police officer,” not constituting interrogation or its functional equivalent (People v Rivers, 56 NY2d 476, 480 [1982]; compare People v Lanahan, 55 NY2d 711 [1981] [detailed recital of evidence held equivalent to interrogation]). Under these circumstances, defendant’s inculpatory statement was self-generated and spontaneous. Concur — Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Andrias and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Richardson, 134 A.D.3d 440, 19 N.Y.S.3d 738 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

134 A.D.3d 440 (People v. Richardson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lanahan
431 N.E.2d 624 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Rivers
438 N.E.2d 862 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)