People v. Richardson

168 A.D.2d 899, 566 N.Y.S.2d 555, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16414
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Richardson. Read the opinion of the Court — 148 A.D.2d 476

Opinion

Judgment unanimously modified as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice and as modified affirmed, in accordance with the following memorandum: The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s motion for severance because the charges were properly joined in one indictment (see, CPL 200.20 [2] [c]) and defendant failed to demonstrate good cause for severance (see, CPL 200.20 [3] [a], [b]; People v Lane, 56 NY2d 1, 7). There is merit to defendant’s contention that he should not have been convicted twice for criminal trespass because there was only one illegal entry (see, People v Sillaway, 144 AD2d 959). Although defendant did not preserve the issue for review, the sentences defendant received on the trespass convictions were imposed consecutively and, therefore, we exercise our discretion and reverse defendant’s trespass conviction on the second count and vacate the sentence imposed thereon. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Connell, J.—burglary, second degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Denman, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Richardson, 168 A.D.2d 899, 566 N.Y.S.2d 555, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16414 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

168 A.D.2d 899 (People v. Richardson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lane
436 N.E.2d 456 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
People v. Sillaway
144 A.D.2d 959 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)