People v. Richard H.

101 A.D.2d 867, 475 N.Y.S.2d 800, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18563
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 21, 1984
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 101 A.D.2d 867 (People v. Richard H.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Richard H., 101 A.D.2d 867, 475 N.Y.S.2d 800, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18563 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from an amended sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.), imposed August 18,1983. H Amended sentence reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, and matter remitted to Criminal Term for resentencing in accordance herewith. $ Where a defendant is convicted on more than one count of a multiple-count indictment, the court must pronounce sentence on each count upon which defendant was convicted (CPL 380.20; People v Licitra 84 AD2d 539). Titone, J. P., Thompson, Bracken and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Hall
173 A.D.2d 729 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
People v. Benoit
115 A.D.2d 608 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
People v. Goddard
112 A.D.2d 379 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 A.D.2d 867, 475 N.Y.S.2d 800, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-richard-h-nyappdiv-1984.