People v. Richard H.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Richard H.

101 A.D.2d 867, 475 N.Y.S.2d 800, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18563

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 21, 1984·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from an amended sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.), imposed August 18,1983. H Amended sentence reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, and matter remitted to Criminal Term for resentencing in accordance herewith. $ Where a defendant is convicted on more than one count of a multiple-count indictment, the court must pronounce sentence on each count upon which defendant was convicted (CPL 380.20; People v Licitra 84 AD2d 539). Titone, J. P., Thompson, Bracken and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from an amended sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.), imposed August 18,1983. H Amended sentence reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, and matter remitted to Criminal Term for resentencing in accordance herewith. $ Where a defendant is convicted on more than one count of a multiple-count indictment, the court must pronounce sentence on each count upon which defendant was convicted (CPL 380.20; People v Licitra 84 AD2d 539). Titone, J. P., Thompson, Bracken and Rubin, JJ., concur.

People v. Richard H., 101 A.D.2d 867, 475 N.Y.S.2d 800, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18563 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

101 A.D.2d 867 (People v. Richard H.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related