People v. Rich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Rich

103 A.D.2d 852, 478 N.Y.S.2d 810, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19508

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 30, 1984·Published

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Linakis, J.), rendered January 6, 1983, convicting him of attempted robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. 1 Judgment affirmed. 11 We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues that could be raised upon appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted. (See Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606.) Lazer, J. P., O’Connor, Weinstein and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Linakis, J.), rendered January 6, 1983, convicting him of attempted robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. 1 Judgment affirmed. 11 We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues that could be raised upon appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted. (See Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606.) Lazer, J. P., O’Connor, Weinstein and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

People v. Rich, 103 A.D.2d 852, 478 N.Y.S.2d 810, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19508 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

103 A.D.2d 852 (People v. Rich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related