People v. Rice

36 A.D.3d 835, 826 N.Y.S.2d 914

This text of 36 A.D.3d 835 (People v. Rice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Rice, 36 A.D.3d 835, 826 N.Y.S.2d 914 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County [836]*836(Latella, J.), rendered November 17, 2004, convicting her of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

In light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt, the prosecutor’s comments in summation, to which objection was made and overruled, constitute harmless error and thus do not warrant reversal (see People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230 [1975]). Schmidt, J.E, Mastro, Santucci and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Crimmins
326 N.E.2d 787 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 A.D.3d 835, 826 N.Y.S.2d 914, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rice-nyappdiv-2007.