People v. Rice

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Rice

105 A.D.2d 854, 481 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20985

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 26, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 105 A.D.2d 854 (People v. Rice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Rice, 105 A.D.2d 854, 481 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20985 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dufficy, J.), rendered March 2,1983, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, robbery in the first degree (seven counts), criminal use of a firearm in the first degree (two counts), assault in the first degree, robbery in the second degree (two counts), criminal use of a firearm in the second degree (two counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, assault in the second degree, reckless endangerment in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and unlawful imprisonment in the first degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues that could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Weinstein, J. P., Brown, Boyers and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dufficy, J.), rendered March 2,1983, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, robbery in the first degree (seven counts), criminal use of a firearm in the first degree (two counts), assault in the first degree, robbery in the second degree (two counts), criminal use of a firearm in the second degree (two counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, assault in the second degree, reckless endangerment in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and unlawful imprisonment in the first degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues that could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Weinstein, J. P., Brown, Boyers and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

105 A.D.2d 854, 481 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20985, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rice-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack